Side-by-side comparison
Two European AI search measurement tools — both EU-resident, both serving the same buyer profile, but with different operating models. Otterly is a leaner SaaS-led option. GEO Assessment couples measurement with an integrated services layer.
EU-resident SaaS dashboard for AI search visibility tracking, cleaner and leaner than US incumbents.
Choose Otterly if
Skip Otterly if
EU-resident measurement plus a senior consultant who designs, interprets, and acts on the data with you.
Choose GEO Assessment if
Skip us if
Otterly is the strongest pure-SaaS option for European brands that want AI search measurement and have the internal capacity to act on the data. The product is clean, EU-resident, and well-priced for what it does.
GEO Assessment competes on a different vector. We share the EU residency advantage but add a services layer — a named senior consultant, co-designed query sets, written analysis, and accountability for what gets done with the findings. For teams without dedicated GEO capacity, that's the difference between a dashboard nobody opens and measurable change in how AI describes you.
Otterly is the right answer when you have internal capacity and want lean European SaaS. They are EU-resident, well-priced for what they do, and the dashboard is clean. If you have a growth team, an SEO lead, or someone on staff whose job description includes acting on AI visibility data, Otterly gives them a sharp, well-built tool at a lower price point than US incumbents.
Otterly is also a sensible choice if you want continuous monitoring and self-serve cadence, and you trust your team to translate the data into action without external support.
You don't have a dedicated GEO lead. Both tools give you the data. Only one of them includes the team that turns the data into action. For brands without dedicated GEO capacity, a Otterly subscription tends to follow a familiar pattern: the dashboard exists, no one logs in regularly, the conversation eventually shifts to whether the category “works.” The category works — it's the operating model that's under-resourced. GEO Assessment includes the operating model in the contract.
You want the deliverable to be a research-grade assessment, not a dashboard. Quarterly written analyses, perception maps, source ecologies, and recommended actions — the artefact your brand team actually presents in a meeting — are our default output. Otterly produces dashboard data; we produce a study.
You want one accountable team rather than tool plus separate agency. If you would have bought Otterly plus an agency to interpret the data, our contract bundles both. The all-in cost ends up similar; the accountability ends up cleaner.
Otterly is one of the more transparent vendors in the category. Here is the honest shape of what we know.
Tiered SaaS subscription
Low-to-mid four-figure annual
Tiers scale by query volume and brand count. Among the most price-accessible serious tools in the category.
What is in the subscription
Per-assessment + services retainer
Four-figure pilot, five-figure annual
4-week paid pilot from low four figures; ongoing quarterly assessments plus services retainer in the five-figure range annually.
What is in the contract
The honest verdict
In the EU market, the closest direct competitors. Both are EU-resident; both target European brands; both compete in evaluations for the same buyer profile. The differentiation is operating model: Otterly is lean SaaS, GEO Assessment includes the services layer.
Headline subscription price, yes. Otterly is at the lean end of category pricing. All-in cost — if you would otherwise buy an agency on top of Otterly to interpret the data — is similar to ours, because we bundle the services. Comparing like-to-like is the only honest comparison.
Yes. Many brands start with Otterly when they have internal capacity, then move to GEO Assessment when the team that owned the work leaves or capacity shrinks. We run a paid pilot alongside any existing Otterly contract to make the comparison concrete before you switch.
Yes for the major engines. We have more flexibility for adding emerging or category-specific engines on customer request. For most categories that doesn't change the answer.
Both are EU-resident, so neither involves the US-vendor GDPR analysis. For most European buyers, this is one of the main reasons to choose either over US-headquartered tools.
If after this comparison you think Otterly is the better fit for your team and your budget, we would rather tell you directly than waste your team's procurement cycle. If you want the integrated services layer alongside the measurement, get in touch.
Get in touch